The Final Book of Daniel; An Ancient Angel Awakens

The true autobiographical account and gospel of a ressurected, reincarnated, biblical prophet.

   
               
 
New age spirituality Vs. religion and fundamentalism
 
daniel
 
     
 

New Age spirituality vs. conservative fundamntalism

 

   
 

"Beware the man of a single book." --Bertrand Russell

There is nothing inherently anti-Christian or "demonic" about New Age beliefs, although some Christians (primarily more conservative ones) object to various New Age beliefs.

 

Intrests included in various New Age beliefs include some of the folowing:

  • Angelology
  • Astral projection
  • Astrology
  • Atlantis
  • Aura Reading and Kirelian Photography
  • Chakras
  • Divination, including tarot cards and scrying

___________________________________________________

About.com describes the New Age movement as follows:

"The term New Age has come to be applied to a wide variety of disparate belief systems. Many New Agers accept only a portion of New Age beliefs, and the totality of New Age beliefs certainly does not represent a single, coherent belief system."

"In addition, there are plenty of people who embrace practices often labeled as New Age but do not consider themselves New Agers."

"New Age beliefs tend to stress personal practices and an avoidance of dogma, as well as discovering our full potential, understanding of the wider spiritual cosmos, and recognition of the interconnectivity of things."

_______________________________________________________

"The New Age Movement (NAM) is a revival of spiritual and divine values and can be called as a Divine Regeneration Movement. New Age Philosophy has conquered the West intellectually and Western culture is currently experiencing a phenomenal shift – sociological, spiritual & ideological. It’s a secular, multi-cultural, multi-religious synthesis, of the Oriental mystical philosophies, mainly Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism & Western Occultism, emphasising Holism, the doctrine that Reality is organically One ( now taught in American Universities after Einstein’s Theory of Relativity )."

(http://www.thenewageblog.com/the-new-age-movement/)

_______________________________________________________

Wkipedia has a page about the new age movement at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Age

And has this to say:

"The New Age movement is a spiritual and quasi-religious Western movement that developed in the latter half of the twentieth century. Its central precepts revolve around "drawing on both Eastern and Western spiritual and metaphysical traditions and then infusing them with influences from self-help and motivational psychology, holistic health, parapsychology, consciousness research and quantum physics" in order to create "a spirituality without borders or confining dogmas" that is inclusive and pluralistic. Another of its primary traits is holding to "a holistic worldview", thereby emphasising that the Mind, Body and Spirit are interrelated and that there is a form of Oneness and unity throughout the universe. It further attempts to create "a worldview that includes both science and spirituality" and thereby embraces a number of forms of science and pseudo-science."

______________________________________

Wikipedia has a link to fundamentalism here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism and has this to say about it:

" Fundamentalism refers to a belief in a strict adherence to an established set of basic principles (usually religious in nature), sometimes as a reaction to perceived doctrinal compromises with modern social and political life.

The term fundamentalism was originally coined to describe a specific package of theological beliefs that developed into a movement within the Protestant community of the United States in the early part of the 20th century, and that had its roots in the Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversy of that time. Until 1950, there was no entry for fundamentalism in the Oxford English Dictionary; the derivative fundamentalist was added only in its second 1989 edition.

The term has since been generalized to mean strong adherence to any set of beliefs in the face of criticism or unpopularity, but has by and large retained religious connotations.

Fundamentalism is commonly used as a pejorative term, particularly when combined with other epithets (as in the phrase "right-wing/left-wing fundamentalists")"

________________________________

"why the fundamentalist approach is wrong:"

Has this to say,

"Indeed, many fundamentalists are so caught up in doctrinal seriousness, that love, service and compassion seem scarcely to even be a part of their thinking. As one correspondent said to me regarding a certain Christian sect's converts, "Its like they go in and surgically remove any sense of love or any sense of humor."

This emphasis on doctrinal conformity seems to be the result of the belief in the requirement of absolute conformity to doctrine to achieve salvation. Yet at the same time, many will also officially claim that simple acceptance of that sect's doctrine is sufficient for salvation. This dichotomy is often seen in the same sect; some of the fundamentalist Christian sects being good examples. The contradiction seems to go unnoticed or if it is noticed, it is ignored."

And,

"The greatest philosophical problem of fundamentalism is that it denies the power of God."

And,

"Why Fundamentalism Is A Force For Evil In Society"


"By distracting otherwise sincere people from honest self-examination and the spiritual growth it makes possible, and by obstructing honest scientific inquiry and intellectual debate, fundamentalism derails the progress that society would achieve by honest, competent religious practice."

http://www.bidstrup.com/religion.htm

__________________________________

The following is from, http://www.religioustolerance.org/newage.htm

"The New Age Movement is in a class by itself. Unlike most formal religions, it has no holy text, central organization, membership, formal clergy, geographic center, dogma, creed, etc. They often use mutually exclusive definitions for some of their terms. The New Age is in fact a free-flowing spiritual movement; a network of believers and practitioners who share somewhat similar beliefs and practices, which they add on to whichever formal religion that they follow. Their book publishers take the place of a central organization; seminars, conventions, books and informal groups replace of sermons and religious services."

Quoting John Naisbitt:

"In turbulent times, in times of great change, people head for the two extremes: fundamentalism and personal, spiritual experience...With no membership lists or even a coherent philosophy or dogma, it is difficult to define or measure the unorganized New Age movement. But in every major U.S. and European city, thousands who seek insight and personal growth cluster around a metaphysical bookstore, a spiritual teacher, or an education center."

_______________________________

http://www.thenewageblog.com/sunday-morning-quiz/

Good blog about the differences and conflict between fundamentalits and New Agers.

_______________________________________________________

From the Bible fallibilty page on www.near-death.com (http://www.near-death.com/experiences/origen11.html)"

"Jesus rebuked the religious leaders of his day for taking a strictly literal, conservative view of the Hebrew Bible. They created an entire system of man-made rules and regulations around their literal interpretation of scriptures. Because they rejected Jesus' liberal interpretation of scripture, their theology was in question, so they had Jesus killed. Today, there are a large number of religious leaders and followers who are making the same mistake. For the last two thousand years of church history, literalism help fan the flames of Inquisitions, crusades, and all kinds of disputes over man-made dogma, such as: works versus faith, trinity versus oneness, eternal security versus no security, baptism versus tongues, and predestination versus free will, just to name a few."

_______________________________

http://www.christinyou.net/pages/Xnotbrel.html

"Christianity is not a book religion" Criticisms and danger of bible worship (idolotry)

_______________________________

http://www.amazon.com/Rescuing-Bible-Fundamentalism-Rethinks-Scripture/dp/0060675187

Great book to read: Rescuing the Bible from fundamentalism

_____________________________________

Recovering fundamentalists:

http://recoveringfundamentalists.com/

_____________________________

Bible condtradictions: http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/by_book.html

http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/ Skeptics annotated bible

_____________________________

http://www.thenewageblog.com/sunday-morning-quiz/

Good blog about the differences between fundamentalists and New Agers.

_______________________________________________________

Here is my link to new age spiritual links: http://finalbookofdaniel.com/links.html

Angels, reincarnation, masters, etc.

_______________________________

Here is Daniel's view on fundamentalism from my book (http://finalbookofdaniel.com/book/):

Criticisms of Fundamentalism

"We understand why children are afraid of darkness, but why are men afraid of light?" - Plato

"Beware the man of a single book." --Bertrand Russell

"I want you to just let a wave of intolerance wash over you. I want you to let a wave of hatred wash over you. Yes, hate is good ... Our goal is a Christian nation. We have a Biblical duty, we are called by God, to conquer this country. We don't want equal time. We don't want pluralism." - Randall Terry, Founder of Operation Rescue, quoted in The News-Sentinel, Fort Wayne, Indiana. 8-16-93

The above comes from a "Christian" fundamentalist. Christ was about love for all and unmatched tolerance. Since when did Jesus hate?

The reader may wonder why Daniel is seemingly assaulting fundamentalists, even though they claim to be of God, and though the people are beautiful (generally), precious souls. First, they are oftentimes dispensers of too many ideas which downright conflict with God's ways of love, light, tolerance and too often promote ignorance. It is an angel’s desire to shed light on ignorance.

Second, they oftentimes prevent people from seeing the true Love and Light of God by limiting the potential of souls to return to whence they came by becoming the Way, by openly discouraging others from seeking their higher, internal truths, by imposing restricted and narrow doctrines and interpretation, usually through fear.

Thirdly, they are a very fast-growing and disproportionately vocal minority, with expanding influence, particularly concerning Biblical prophecy, politics and morality, which they desire to be legislated into laws or even a new theocracy.

In a fundamentalist view, whenever there is a conflict between love and compassion, and doctrinal seriousness and legalism, the latter seems to prevail in choice. In their view, it is absolute conformity to doctrine that provides salvation (and of course, everyone else is going to Hell), where personal spiritual growth is too often discouraged.

The ability for one to find the Way to enlightenment internally – to work out his own salvation, as Daniel, a living example, has done – is deemed "false," and the only way, they believe, is to blindly submit to the written word. One Mormon leader once said to an audience of university students, "Don't think for yourself. The thinking has already been done."

It was the fundamentalist religious leaders whom Jesus pointed out as the hypocrites (scribes, Pharisees) who ultimately persecuted and conspired in bringing on the crucifixion. In their misguided zeal to kill the Light, they refused to see the Truth, even when it was staring them in the face. Having the outward appearance of godliness but inwardly full of hypocrisy and filth, they tithe and do good works, but neglect justice, mercy and faith. It is the case with 21st-century Daniel vs. Fundamentalism as well; things never change.

These are the ones who go out of their way to find a single convert, yet lock people out of the Kingdom of Heaven and make the convert as much a child of Hell as themselves. They pass off human precepts as divine doctrine, yet are godly in appearance. Daniel is now attempting to bring Truth and Light into the world by challenging the rigid doctrines, darkness and hypocrisy of his day, as did Jesus, who was therefore persecuted and killed.

"Therefore I send you prophets, sages and scribes, some of whom you will kill and crucify, and some you will flog in your (synagogues, churches) and pursue from town to town." (Matthew 23)

So may it be with Daniel. It's because of jealousy and fear that people commit such a travesty upon true prophets of God.

You see, their favorite friend is Satan. Anything and everything that does not fit into their particular narrow views, or that which may threaten this security (which in this case is based on an inerrant, literal Bible or quran) such as anything new and enlightening, or the possibility that a holy angel can incarnate in human form, is attributed to "the work of the devil." In fact, they glorify and allocate so much power to this "Satan" that one might even conclude they are Satan worshipers themselves disguised as light!

You know what the tools of "Satan" are? FEAR AND DOUBT ... fear of growth, and of true spirituality, light and love. Fundamentalist preachers use generous quantities of fear and doubt in the way they scare their congregations with such Dark Age thought, and it is THEY who can be accused of leading people astray! Satan is the angel of darkness ... not light.

They go so far as to say such idiocies as, "All those who seek answers outside of the Bible are getting deceived by Satan!" Instead of trying to find true meaning about themselves or God, they will always "warn" you about all sorts of things that you simply MUST be frightened of.

And of course if you stray from such twisted concepts, then they will tell you to "turn to Jesus" to avoid the Judgment, Hell, etc. They will see, in virtually everything, evil, from a New World Order or New Age united by a deceptive Antichrist, to how homosexuals are going to fry in Hell, and why it's OK to bomb abortion clinics.

They loudly attack other peaceful, productive fellow Christians as belonging to a "cult". (By proper definition only 0.1 percent are ever involved in cults.) Yet in their misguided zeal and ignorance, they make that about 50 percent. In fact, Fundamentalism is the fastest growing "cult" in America since the 70’s. They idol worship a book, they effectively worship Satan with the power they give him, presume only they are right and everyone else is going to Hell, and have all the same qualities as what they deem to be cultism. (Of course, the entire movement of Christianity can be classified as a cult by this definition.)

Here is properly what to watch out for in a "cult;" fundamentalism applies to most, if not all, of these:

* Isolation from everyone or everything outside of the group and its control. "Us" vs. "them" mentality.
* Everyone external to the group is perceived as a negative or not equal; one must be a member.
* Partial commitment or belief is not tolerated; everything is either/or.
* Excessive fasting and praying, extreme tension or stress, which may result in eating disorders, chronic depression, acute anxiety, physical exhaustion, or illness.
* Compulsively speaking of the group, leaders and doctrines.
* Continually quoting certain scriptures emphasized by the group while ignoring the big picture, while avoiding as "satanic" all discussions which may seem to criticize the group or threaten its doctrine. For everything outside of the group is evil, of the devil, or worldly.
* Complete or total domination of the participant's time in the group; attending Bible study, crusades, revivals, prayer meetings, services, or other group activities obsessively, especially at the expense of other important pursuits, such as family, old friends, or other interests.
* Discouraging questions concerning its leaders or doctrines. Doubt may be equated to an attack by the devil upon the follower's mind or psychological manipulation.
* Fear and doubt, usually irrational.
* Compulsively witnessing their beliefs to everyone, sometimes in a confrontational or extreme manner.

Distinguishing a Christian fundamentalist from other Christians is their reliance on the Bible to the complete exclusion of any authority wielded by the Church or even a modern prophet issuing "new" revelation.

The second thing is Fundamentalists' insistence in a faith in Christ as one's personal Lord and Savior as the ONLY means to avoid Hell. "Do you accept Christ as your personal Lord and Savior?" they ask. "Have you been saved?" Or, "God's 'word' is eternal Truth, therefore infallible."

The Bible is largely based on many eternal eternal truths, yet is not infallible because it was written by inspired but imperfect humans who invariably included and were influenced by their times, mythology and culture and other absurdities. I could go on to mention many instances of Bible errancies and contradictions (there are plenty – in fact hundreds and hundreds). I am not here, though, to disrespect the Bible, because I am included within it and we should definitely pay close attention to its message as a priority perhaps, but simply to demonstrate an important point.

That is, the Bible holds the basic guidelines of morality, living a sound life, includes God's Plan regarding the Jewish Messiah and prophetic past and future of the age and Israel, yet it has been viewed and used from an improper perspective.

The Bible is not a science textbook of the universe or spirit world and does not contain all the answers – only a fraction. It is not a rulebook to be strictly adhered to with respect to every moral attribute literally discussed, nor should the elaborate symbology of books like Revelation be taken too seriously or literally, for they are largely figurative. It was only what God intended to reveal at the time it was written, and employing this book as though it, or any other Scripture, were the only source of truth and heavenly revelation is simply wrong.

The Bible is also missing some important scriptures such as the book of Enoch and Apocryphal writings (including portions of Daniel!) that were left out of canonization by the Roman Catholic Church fathers, which all present churches ultimately branched from. By including and thereby following only what these early fathers of the church themselves decided to include wrongly elevates the compilers to god-like status and creates an idol in the form of a book. Moreover, as the countless different religions that have sprung from the current Bible attest, Scriptural infallibility is further undermined by imperfect human interpretation and readership and language.

If God were to give us all, or even a small portion, of the nature of nature, the universe and the spirit world, the entire earth would be filled with massive volumes of books, crowding out the surface of the planet. Accordingly, many use this argument of exclusion to explain away anomalies such as scientific reasoning and conclusions, reincarnation, UFO's, NDE's, evolution, psychic ability, history, etc. by implying: "It's not really discussed in the Bible, therefore it holds no validity and is the work of Satan."

It is mind-boggling, for instance, that so many otherwise intelligent people, even with all the overwhelming scientific evidence available in the modern age, still consider the earth to be roughly six thousand years old, because the book of Genesis says "God created earth in six days," (and the seventh for rest) with scripturally based genealogical records. This is literalism at its worst.

This ludicrously futile disagreement between evolution and creationism is based not on facts, rationality, logic or real science, but hardened hearts, passion, blind "faith" and belief between the most extreme fringes of both sides, who are always the most vocal concerning any subject.

Actually, both are correct on many points, and both are incorrect on many points. The earth really is around four or five billion years old – which one may suggest could correspond to Genesis' six days of creation (in a "God day"), and life did in fact evolve (though the Darwinist theory is seriously flawed, but not totally incorrect as the creationists would therefore imply).

The story of Creation of Genesis is largely symbolic mythology, and was derived from ancient Sumerian concepts of the Beginning. Evolution is a natural process of life, the earth and the universe.

Hence the extreme evolutionists are also flawed in arguing that life is totally chance, that life is a fluke creation of a Godless universe, blindly following a strict set of scientific, natural rules. It is not the strong that survive, but those most adaptable to change. Rather than slow, gradual evolution, life evolves in great spurts of birth, maturity, then catastrophe whence from this catastrophe those surviving experience an abrupt explosion in growth. That is why there are often missing links. Souls also undergo spiritual growth through repeated reincarnations, learning until the soul in question evolves beyond the need for continual rebirths and moves on to different dimensions. This too can occur in an accelerated fashion, in the space of one lifetime, negating the need to learn further karmic lessons.

The heart of fundamentalism is driven by unintellectual, closed-minded rigidity, passion and belief, using tactics and arguments based on fear, emotion and rhetoric rather than on facts, rationality, common sense or even divine truths.

The fundamentalist approach ignores vast tracts of reality, for instance by selecting out-of-context passages of Scripture extracted from the Bible and twisting them to whatever argument they believe their religion believes, but devoid of guidance by the Spirit, often using them to justify slavery, sexism, racism, wars, etc., which neither Jesus nor any other true prophet or angel ever promoted. And if you dare challenge them with facts or intuitive common sense, or don't agree with someone whose basis of religious doctrinal security is rooted in the concept of an inerrant, literally true right-down-to-the-last-punctuation-mark Bible, according to their brand of interpretation?

Well, then you are "going straight to Hell," or, "must be influenced by the devil." Anything that a fundamentalist cannot easily explain, rationalize, or conceptualize into the framework of his narrow belief system, in his mind, must be excluded by assigning any or all anomalous phenomena to "Satan."

This can include virtually anything new, scientific, unknown, spiritual or revolutionary, such as NDE's, UFO's, reincarnation, evolution, unknown spiritual concepts, modern science or any other faith perceived as a threat to the security of their doctrine. (They love to apply the term "cult" to any movement outside the mainstream, such as "New Age".) In such a distorted world as theirs, the power and influence given to this "Satan" is used for control by using Satan's own best tools: doubt and fear. Indeed, this grotesquely borderlines on Satan-worship!

"Demons" have little real power over us; they have only as much power over your life as you are willing to give them. Our very belief and glorification of them creates their existence. Yet some imagine "Satan" as some sort of hyper-potent entity, an ultra-cunning, omnipresent being almost equal to God in power, running around with horns and pitchfork, causing all the problems of the world.

That kind of "Satan" simply does not exist outside of misread ancient writings, popularized by overactive religious imagination. It is mythology blown out of proportion: a symbolic representation of our darker, mortal selves. And if such a being existed, he's long since been under the chains of Hell. This is not to say that there are not negative and dark forces, or disincarnate spirits, because there are, yet they are not nearly this powerful; if one has a true connection to God and the light, they cannot harm one. They certainly do not have the potency many attribute to them.

What kind of entity would enjoy doing such a thing for all eternity? What kind of God would permit it? Or disallow such an entity from ever reascending? If you are one who refuses to believe this kind of "Satan" does not exist, then why don't you help Daniel in destroying him, by not thinking about him, and replacing him with the light and love of God? The devil does exist, but not in the way many are taught. It is symbolic mythology representative of the darker side of human nature. It is as simple as that.

This may seem like heresy to some Christians, and I will be criticized for it, but just like Jesus two millennia ago, where the Word and Spirit of Truth became flesh, so it has through 21st-century Daniel. I've actually become the Truth, Light and the Life. Before one gets incredulous and indignant at such a proposition, let's explain.

The qualifications for being (in my case becoming) an incarnated angel do not necessitate taking courses in theology or extensive literal knowledge of the Scriptures or the Bible and details contained therein or belonging to any faith or religion of any kind, because the Truth and Word as it was meant to be has become ingrained in the mind, body, soul and thought pattern through salvation by aligning to divine will by conquering Self, purifying the heart and mind.

One may be an expert on the stories and minute details of the Bible and can quote ad infinitum in strings and twist them into what may seem like an emotionally appealing argument on the surface, but this is actually intellectual (and spiritual) dishonesty. Some tend to read the Bible ONLY, at the expense of all else, thereby limiting their perspective of divine reality.

In other words, Daniel need not read the Bible or other scriptures to expand spiritual awareness/consciousness, but merely for the educational knowledge necessary to effectively deal with critics in writings and arguments. The Bible is neither Daniel's final authority nor object of worship, but the Most High God and visions received from God are his authority and therefore take precedent, for they are effectively a continuation of scriptures.

An analogy to the above topic is someone who would enroll in a school course in "learning how to walk" when he is five years old, then this same five-year-old turns around and says to a three-year-old who has already mastered walking, attaining the highest level, saving himself,

"I can walk better than you!"

"Why do you say that?" the three-year-old would respond.

"Because I learned every nuance about walking, I've studied it and read all about it for months! And there's only one way to do it right, and only I can tell you how to walk properly, and if you don't accept my way, you shall certainly trip and kill yourself. This book I've read on the subject is infallible ... and I can show how to be saved from tripping and falling, and you must 'accept the author of the book as your savior'! If only you follow its every word to a T! And only this book."

The three-year-old has already mastered the truth of how to walk, and already knows that he has saved himself from tripping and killing himself, because it is naturally ingrained into his being and thought process, and he has become a master of the Way through independent effort. In attempting to show his adversary the truth of discovering how to walk and save himself from tripping, without the requirement of doctrinal study, and how incredibly simple yet necessarily effortful it is, he will thenceforth be persecuted and treated condescendingly by his elder adversary, who tells the three-year-old he's condemned to die, even though the five-year-old should clearly be capable of recognizing his mastery over walking ability.

In this situation, the three-year-old, seeing the five-year-old's staunch resistance to change, and inability to see the light, will shake his head, and move on to find the lost, and show them that they can save themselves, through themselves, with some effort and turmoil, and he will point out that the scriptures teaching the finer points in walking are important and invaluable, and quite handy to refer to from time to time.

And there you have Jesus, Buddha, Krishna, Daniel, and the various teachers and masters of days gone by represented by the three-year-old. Can you believe I still am approached by evangelists saying I have to "accept Jesus as my savior, otherwise go to Hell," even among some who know I'm an angel?

The current canonical Christian Bible is not the "only" Bible and does not comprise the WHOLE truth (no one book can). While it may form a complete picture in that it has a beginning and end, truth cannot be restricted to it alone.

The Bible (as well as Daniel's writings) should not be read literally, but through the process of seeking self-evident, eternal truths, done prayerfully, not treating it as the "inerrant word of God." Yet spiritual truths are very difficult to understand in words, language being an inefficient means of communication, subject to misinterpretation, based on the reader's spiritual development, mood, and personality, and the influence of cultural biases.

There are a million different ways people interpret scriptures, which explains the hundreds upon hundreds of different sects; there are 38,000 different christian denominations worlwide, most nased on the bible only. God did not write the Bible. Inspired humans did, and humans are imperfect. God is not limited to the Bible, and did not stop revealing 2000 years ago, or in the case of Islam, later. God is constantly showing His existence, and the Near-Death Experience (NDE) is one of the most conventional, modern forms that God manifests. God is revealing through Daniel (however imperfect the filter) as you read these words; this book is written by an incarnate ANGEL OF GOD.

Thankfully, Daniel has had limited religious bias which can poison the word, and has eliminated most cultural, religious and personal biases, allowing as much divine truth as possible to shine through.

Simply because certain topics that have come to light in the modern age are not discussed at length in scriptures (such as NDE's, reincarnation, UFO's, evolution and other sciences, etc.), does not mean it is "of the devil" as some would suggest. Those who limit the omnipotent power and abilities of God to a book or a narrow interpretation thereof, no matter how great that book or interpretation, are creating a false idol to be worshiped.

The Bible is also NOT one book, but 66 separate books written over centuries. To perceive scriptures in such a manner implies writings from manuscripts such as Luke, John or Matthew – many written more than an entire generation or two after Jesus' ministry, and from word-of-mouth-sources – are somehow the "absolute word of God." Much of the New Testament, as well as the formation of the early church, originated from Christ-oppressor-turned-apostle Paul. Is it in any way rational or intellectually honest to presume that Paul's personal letters to the churches, such as Corinthians, Romans etc., be taken as God's infallible word, simply because "it's in the Bible?" Should we take literally Paul's comments that women should remain silent in churches, because it's "in the Bible?"

Paul was human, and obviously had his own cultural influences and brand of (then considered new age) mysticism, and Paul was not omniscient. Nor was John or Peter or Mark. In fact, in one of his letters to the early Churches, Paul actually admits that he was a "liar for the lord."

If you wish to completely ignore Daniel's words, that of an actual angel of God at the end of days, and instead worship 2000-year old letters written to Churches by Paul, you are free to do so, as nobody is forcing you to believe anything, but you are limiting truth.

Should we put to death anyone who works on a Sabbath (Saturday/Sunday) as is commanded in Exodus 31, because Moses said so to the ancient Israelites?

"... Six days shall work be done, but the seventh is a Sabbath day of solemn rest, holy to the Lord; whoever does any work on the Sabbath day shall die ..." Moses (Exodus)

Am I obligated to kill myself because my employer schedules me to work Sunday evenings? Am I divinely obligated to visit every 24-hour convenience store and start shooting all the employees on duty because "it's in the Bible?" Doesn't the commandment "Thou shalt not kill" seem contradictory in this case?

Slavery and laws thereof are strewn throughout the Old Testament. In the past slaveholders have certainly used the Bible to justify such actions. Does this mean it is right or holy to own and trade in slaves? Or practice polygamy?

According to the Bible, pork, ham and bacon are not to be eaten, because they are "unclean." Does it make me any less holy if I eat pig's meat? Why is pork any less holy than beef or chicken? The answer is that it is not. Now, from a health standpoint, pork IS unclean in relation to other meats because it disproportionately contains saturated fat, which clogs arteries and induces cancer and other ills; it is also a carrier of certain parasites. So in this sense, such Kosher food laws often do make sense from a nutritional standpoint, but are not indicative of "holiness."

Should I sacrifice and burn a prime steer in my backyard on an altar as a sacrifice, sin-offering, because the odor thereof is "pleasing to the Lord?" (These were actually pagan rituals adopted by Moses.) What would my neighbors make of such a situation?

The broader teachings of Jesus and the New Testament – which were actually highly spiritual and metaphysical – can make perfect sense only when read from an unbiased, metaphysical, figurative, spiritual and not literal standpoint.

The phrase "I am the way, truth and the life, no one come to the Father but by me," for instance, actually means Jesus found the keys to salvation and conquered death, where the carnal body is no longer a hindrance to free expression of the soul, and attained perfect alignment to divine will, and His life pattern is something to be led and copied by man as an example, a Way out and ascension: unconditional love made manifest. The phrase may also imply he is also the Rescuer (Savior) from hellish realms many people experience as the Light in NDE's: "No one come to the Father except through the Son" ... "But I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw ALL men to myself." (John 12:32)

Yet this can also be interpreted (as it is nowadays) to imply that one must take a superficial oath and declare "I accept Jesus as my Savior" as the "only means to salvation" to avoid being thrown in Hell as so many evangelistic preachers suggest, often with more out-of-context quotes.

Example: "... Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house." (Acts 16:31) Saved from what? An angry God, or Satan? Or is it faith and belief in the Pattern, or Way of Jesus which is Christ-consciousness? Believe what, exactly? That Jesus was born, lived in the flesh and died? Of course Jesus was and did. Or do we believe in the Way – the pattern He lived and taught –as an example for all men to attain through Christ-consciousness, as the 'only' way to salvation? What am I supposed to be "believing" in this case? See how this can get confusing? Of course, every fundamentalist is right now jumping up screaming, "I know! I know! Our doctrine states ..."

I'm sure you do.

Daniel has also become the Way, as did Buddha, and many other Masters most never heard of. They all have equal authority in proclaiming "No one goes back to the Father but by ME." For they have become the Pattern; the fulfillment of the Law or Mosaic Torah, and are "in Christ." It is what Jesus meant with the phrase, "Do you think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them." (NIV) It is the fulfillment of all the mystery religions as the apex to which we all must ascend.

Jesus demonstrated this fallacy of how literally his disciples, when condemning the fundamentalists of his day, responded to the phrase

"'...Watch out, and beware of the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees.' They said to one another, 'It is because we have brought no bread.' And becoming aware of it, Jesus said, 'You of little faith, why are you talking about having no bread? ... How could you fail to perceive that I was not talking about bread?’ ... Then they understood he had not told them to beware of the yeast of bread, but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees." (Matthew 16)

So beware the yeast of the fundamentalists, Daniel's Satan of darkness, who will attempt to throw truth to the ground under the guise of light.

Some of the above may sound quite harsh, and full of rhetoric, and sarcastic, but it should be noted that this is how many use the power of persuasion to limit expansive and enlightening viewpoints to protect outmoded but dominant belief systems.

 

__________________________________

 

This site is non-for-profit and free to read. To help with costs, click here to visit the donations page!

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
     
               
   
               
 

Sister Sites by reincarnated messenger Daniel, related to year 2012 Mayan doomsday and "end of the world" or endtimes prophecies and economic collapse/Peak Oil analysis issues:

http://endtimeprophet2012.com

Daniel's "Messianic" sollution where YOU can participate with others together in regular, synchronized prayers for world peace and spiritual ascension for year 2012 related issues:

http://www.worldpeaceprayervision.org

This site and online book is FREE, totally "not-for-profit," and welcomes your financial support. Click HERE to visit the donations pageto see "how" and "why" and how you will be guaranteed blessings for yourself, loved ones and for earth from Above.

 

 
 
© 2011 Daniel Eli (Author) - All Rights Reserved.
 
     
     
Since Sept. 22, 2010